NACCHO Aboriginal #Ear Health : #ClosingtheGapDay and hearing loss: an invisible barrier obstructs progress


“Avoidance is a way of coping with anxiety about being shamed. Repeated avoidance results in limited engagement and poor outcomes for programs designed to Close the Gap.

The use of hearing loss responsive communication strategies can help to deal with this barrier

 These strategies can be as important as culturally appropriate processes in programs.

Indeed, there is an overlap between the two. For those with hearing loss, what is said in culturally familiar language within a culturally familiar process is easier to understand.”

Hearing loss among Indigenous Australians is a largely unseen barrier to Closing the Gap programs, according to Dr Damien Howard and Jody Barney, who explain how to be “hearing loss responsive” in service delivery and communications.

Originally published

 ” Indigenous Australians have one of the highest levels of ear disease and hearing loss in the world.

Rates are up to ten times more than non-Indigenous Australians and the National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation estimates Indigenous healthcare is currently 30 to 50 years behind the rest of the country “

Read or Share all NACCHO Ear and Hearing Articles HERE

This weeks NACCHO Aboriginal Health News Alerts will  include

Tuesday Save a date Wednesday Job alerts Thursday NACCHO Members Good News

How to submit ? Email to Colin Cowell NACCHO Media   4.30 pm  day before publication

Communication difficulties caused by the widespread unidentified hearing loss among Indigenous people in Australia continue to undermine the effectiveness of Closing the Gap programs.

An Aboriginal worker with mild hearing loss once commented: “You see that look, the look that tells you they are thinking you are some stupid blackfella and you don’t want to say you don’t understand; ‘Can you tell me it again?’

“You just want to get away and never want to work with them again if you can help it.”

Many people act on these kinds of feelings. They seek to avoid people, situations and service providers because of these reactions. The everyday communication difficulties caused by their hearing loss contribute to anxiety and disengagement. They will often seek to avoid education, health and employment support services designed to help them.

For instance, people may not go to health clinics, or do not comply with provided treatment. Avoidance of specialist medical appointments is one feature of this. In some specialist medical visits to remote communities, 50% of patients do not attend booked appointments. This can have dire health implications for individuals. It is also an immense waste of resources.

When hearing loss begins early in life, it has greater impact than the late onset hearing loss that is experienced by non-Indigenous Australians who are hard of hearing. Their hearing loss is generally caused by occupational noise exposure and ageing.

Indigenous hearing loss is usually caused by endemic childhood middle ear disease. Children with current ear disease often have a temporary hearing loss. Repeated infections can cause lasting damage and some level of permanent mild to moderate hearing loss. Up to 70% of Indigenous people are affected — fewer in urban communities, more in remote communities.

The impact of this hearing loss is pervasive.

We know that school attendance rates for Indigenous children with hearing loss are below those for other students. We know they experience more difficulty with learning when they do attend school. We know they display more behavioural problems when at school. We know Indigenous workers with hearing loss have difficulty securing and holding jobs, have greater performance difficulties and frequently avoid participation in workplace training.

There is also increasing concern about hearing loss as a factor in the over-representation of Indigenous people in the criminal justice system; 94% of prison inmates in the Northern Territory have been found to have a significant degree of hearing loss.

Those familiar with Indigenous disadvantage may wonder why they have not heard about the incidence and impact of hearing loss among adults. One reason is that early onset conductive hearing loss is mostly invisible.

First, most Indigenous people who are hard of hearing are not aware that their hearing is not normal. The early origin of their hearing loss means it is something they have experienced for most of their life. For them, what they how they hear is ‘normal’. If asked, they would deny having a hearing loss.

Second, service providers (teachers, nurses, doctors, trainers, health professionals, social workers and police among them) are unlikely to recognise poor hearing as an issue for people they work with. Communication difficulties arising from hearing loss are generally attributed only to language and cultural differences, or to limited intelligence or poor motivation. The latter two perceptions, when noticed by clients astute in reading body language, can further compound disengagement.

It is easy to imagine that hearing aids are all that is needed to resolve issues. They can help some, but will not resolve all communication difficulties.

The communication issues experienced by an adult with early onset hearing loss are the result of both current hearing loss and the ‘legacy effects’ of unidentified hearing loss since childhood. These may include a preference for visual communication strategies, anxiety related to an intense fear of being ‘shamed’ and a limited store of contextual knowledge that helps with understanding what is said.

A store of contextual knowledge is what people normally acquire through fully hearing what is said to them, and around them. Without a store of relevant contextual knowledge — the big picture — what is said in any situation is harder to understand. So people with early onset hearing loss not only have trouble hearing what is said, but they also frequently have difficulty understanding what they hear.

Avoidance is a way of coping with anxiety about being shamed. Repeated avoidance results in limited engagement and poor outcomes for programs designed to Close the Gap.

The use of hearing loss responsive communication strategies can help to deal with this barrier. These strategies can be as important as culturally appropriate processes in programs. Indeed, there is an overlap between the two. For those with hearing loss, what is said in culturally familiar language within a culturally familiar process is easier to understand.

Other key components of hearing loss responsive service provision include the following:

  • using highly visual communication strategies
  • minimising background noise during conversations
  • using the language clients know best
  • using ‘pre-learning’ – providing information in advance to help explain the context, so people can better understand what will be discussed
  • services having amplification devices to use as part of service delivery
  • training staff in the use of more effective communication strategies — this includes training workers to recognise hearing loss, develop necessary skills and avoid responses that prompt shame, anxiety and disengagement

We believe Closing the Gap programs will continue to fall short of targeted outcomes until they are designed to be responsive to the needs of those with hearing loss.

NACCHO Save a dates Register your event here

22 March2017 Indigenous Ear Health Workshop  in Adelaide


The 2017 Indigenous Ear Health Workshop to be held in Adelaide in March will focus on Otitis Media (middle ear disease), hearing loss, and its significant impact on the lives of Indigenous children, the community and Indigenous culture in Australia.

The workshop will take place on 22 March 2017 at the Adelaide Convention Centre in Adelaide, South Australia.

The program features keynote addresses by invited speakers who will give presentations aligned with the workshop’s main objectives:

  • To identify and promote methods to strengthen primary prevention and care of Otitis Media (OM).
  • To engage and coordinate all stakeholders in OM management.
  • To summarise current and future research into OM pathogenesis (the manner in which it develops) and management.
  • To present the case for consistent and integrated funding for OM management.

Invited speakers will include paediatricians, public health physicians, ear nose and throat surgeons, Aboriginal health workers, Education Department and a psychologist, with OM and hearing updates from medical, audiological and medical science researchers.

The program will culminate in an address emphasising the need for funding that will provide a consistent and coordinated nationwide approach to managing Indigenous ear health in Australia.

Those interested in attending may include: ENT surgeons, ENT nurses, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health workers, audiologists, rural and regional general surgeons and general practitioners, speech pathologists, teachers, researchers, state and federal government representatives and bureaucrats; in fact anyone interested in Otitis Media.

The workshop is organised by the Australian Society of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (ASOHNS) and is held just before its Annual Scientific Meeting (23 -26 March 2017). The first IEH workshop was held in Adelaide in 2012 and subsequent workshops were held in Perth, Brisbane and Sydney.

For more information go to the ASOHNS 2017 Annual Scientific Meeting Pre-Meeting Workshops section at

Or contact:

Mrs Lorna Watson, Chief Executive Officer, ASOHNS Ltd

T: +61 2 9954 5856   or  E

NACCHO welcomes feedback/comment:Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s