Reproduced from MJA Insight

RACISM towards Indigenous Australians has health consequences that should be targeted in medical education, according to a Perspective in the latest MJA. (1)

 Professor Dennis McDermott, director of the Poche Centre for Indigenous Health and Well-Being at Flinders University, Adelaide, wrote that doctors needed a grounding in the health consequences of racism and an appreciation of widespread systemic discrimination.

 “This includes understanding how the resultant inequitable access to services, patient non-compliance, ‘taking own leave’ from hospital and ineffective health promotion compromise Indigenous health outcomes”, wrote Professor McDermott, a Koori psychologist with more than 30 years experience in community health and Indigenous mental health and wellbeing.

 Professor McDermott said the literature provided “solid evidence” that racism was a determinant and driver of health inequalities. “Racism is not only an everyday occurrence for many Indigenous Australians, but also one that gets under the skin, and ‘makes us sick’.”

 He said an analysis of the health consequences of racism as part of medical education was made difficult because racist acts and systemic discrimination were not recognised.

 “Whether the educational setting is a primary medical degree or further professional development, participants report bringing low levels of understanding of Indigenous issues with them. A new paradigm of learning must emerge”, Professor McDermott said.

He wants new frameworks of thinking to end the current “false dichotomy separating clinical competence from self-reflective practice”.

 “Becoming a thinking, culturally safe practitioner is also the prerequisite for emerging as a clinically safe one.

 “Developing new frameworks of thinking may require disassembling existing planks of belief: a transformative unlearning. Good cultural-safety education generates disquiet, but makes the uncomfortable comfortable enough, through sensitive classroom facilitation in a mutually respectful environment”, Professor McDermott said.

Most Australians had difficulty recognising the corrosive attitudes many Indigenous Australians reported. This was reflected in the “resurgence of bipartisan paternalism” which resulted in the reimposition of the NT “emergency response” for a further 10 years, Professor McDermott wrote. The Senate approved the 10-year extension of the intervention late last week. (2)

Associate Professor Elizabeth Chalmers, a director of General Practice Education and Training (GPET), said although more could always be done, racism was recognised in educating both GP registrars and in ongoing professional development.

Professor Chalmers, who works in the NT, said since GPET began in 2000, it had an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander reference group with a wide membership base, working closely with the National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation, to help regional training providers develop culturally appropriate programs.

Following an evaluation there is now a GPET board Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander advisory group, which Professor Chalmers cochairs with Dr Tammy Kimpton from the Australian Indigenous Doctors’ Association, to provide expert and culturally sound advice about activities aimed at increasing the number of GP registrars training in community controlled and other Indigenous health services.

Professor Chalmers said the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine also actively encouraged education and training in Indigenous health. “Currently 98% of AGPT [Australian General Practice Training] registrars undergo a cultural awareness program”, she said.

 Cultural training and access to mentors and elders helped to raise awareness of the issues facing Indigenous Australians.

 However, Professor Chalmers acknowledged that racism was still sometimes encountered among GP registrars. “We do know of quite a few Aboriginal registrars who have had to deal with racism”, she said.

 “We can’t take our eye off the ball”, Professor Chalmers said.

 – Kath Ryan

There have been many comments including

Read them all click here

• Posted by:
• Dr Horst Herb
• 02/07/2012

The commonly accepted definition of racism appears to be preferential treatment (or the opposite) of one population over another population based on ethnicity as only criteria.

 Singling out ATSI people among Australia’s ethnically diverse population is blatant racism by any generally accepted standard.

Why can’t the bureaucrats and armchair ethicists not leave us alone and let us do what we do best – namely treating a patient as a patient, solely based on their medical presentation and needs, to the best of our capabilities.

There are ethnic groups in Australia with much worse risk factors than ATSI people, and there is the one most important thing those armchair experts (who for some reason seem to be incapable of understanding statistics) invariably seem to forget: namely that individual variance exceeds ethnic variance.

 In plain English it means that just because an individual belongs to a certain group, it does not mean that this individual will always share the statistically more likely traits of that group. There will be individuals of non-ATSI background who will have a much higher INDIVIDUAL risk of getting diabetes, infections, alcoholism or whatever the statistical fad of the day is – and viceversa.

To me as a doctor, a patient is a patient. I will not discriminate against any of my patients in favour or against just because they appear to belong or claim to belong to a certain ethnic background. Shame on Australian politicians and bureaucrats to perpetuate and aggravate the damage racism has done to this country by continuing it through their discriminating MBS and PBS subsidies