NACCHO political alert: Speech to Medicare local Forum Canberra Hon Tanya Plibersek MP

 untitled

Medicare local forum Canberra

The speech is provided to NACCHO members for information only and is not NACCHO Policy

Please note: NACCHO will be responding next week

As Health Minister, it’s always such a privilege to meet with some of the brightest minds and passionate advocates in the Australian health system. So thank you for the opportunity to do that again today.

And congratulations on playing such an important part in reshaping the Australian health system.

The establishment of Medicare Locals is emblematic of how this Government has acted to shift the gravity in the health system towards primary healthcare.

Medicare Locals are part our Government’s National Health Reform agenda. An agenda that’s changing the landscape of Australian healthcare – from a system focussed on the best treatments for people who are sick in hospital, to one that keeps people well too.

It’s change based on the best evidence about what works to give patients quality healthcare when they need it, where they need it.

As we all know, the evidence is clear. Health systems centred on primary healthcare have better outcomes.

As I’ve said before, but it’s important to reinforce, we just have to look at the findings of the World Health Report in 2008. The Report found that where countries at the

same level of economic development are compared, those that were organised around the tenets of primary healthcare produced better health outcomes for the same investment.

Today I wanted to speak with you about three things:

  • Firstly, how Medicare Locals are transitioning from the establishment to the delivery phase;
  •  Secondly, about engaging with Australians on what their Medicare Local is doing for them; and
  •  Thirdly, why the devolution of decision making and responsibility to Medicare Locals is so important, and how that flexibility supports innovation.

Medicare locals transitioning from establishment to delivery

Since 2009, we have worked to set up the architecture for Medicare Locals, so each organisation can operate with the confidence of strong governance and support.

But as important as that architecture is, we’re now on to the exciting stuff – the transition of Medicare Locals from establishment to the delivery phase.

That is, health professionals on the ground delivering services to people – across the nation.

I find it extremely disappointing to hear some describe Medicare Locals as just another layer of red tape.

I’ve spoken to health professionals and the people they help in Medicare Locals throughout Australia – and nothing could be further from the truth.

You know, as I know, that Medicare Locals are health services, not health bureaucracies. And those who suggest otherwise do so in spite of the facts.

The truth is that around seven out of ten Medicare local staff work directly with patients -More than 1740 workers across Australia

I fail to see which doctor, which nurse, which psychologist, or which patient would be helped by cutting the $1.2 billion for Medicare Locals out of the system.

The word Medicare in the name ‘Medicare Local’ reminds us all what an integral part Medicare Locals play in Australia’s world-class universal health system.

Any assault on Medicare Locals is an assault on Medicare and our system of universal healthcare. And it’s an insult to those health professionals who work so hard to help so many.

Make no mistake – to me, and to this Government, Medicare Locals are no optional extra. Although much newer, Medicare Locals are as important to our healthcare system as the MBS or the PBS.

They are also the vital link between community health and hospitals – the other three out of ten Medicare Local workers are helping to ensure patients are cared for properly whether in their own home, a community setting, or going into or coming out of hospital.

Engaging with australians on what their medicare local is doing for them

Because Medicare Locals are in their infancy, it is critical we work together to engage with Australians about what Medicare Locals mean for them.

As I visit Medicare Locals throughout the country, I see first-hand the incredible work going on – and the difference that work is making to people’s lives.

And they are the stories we must share.

Only last Thursday I visited the Footprints program at Newstead in Brisbane which is supported by Metro North Brisbane Medicare Local through its flexible fund.

Footprints uses the money to provide an active outreach service targeting the homeless community in their region to access primary healthcare services, and to help them with advanced care planning.

Or the new after-hours service that’s just opened at the Nepean Hospital – helping families in Penrith and the Blue Mountains access a GP instead of having to turn up at an emergency room.

And there are many many other examples of fine work happening across Australia.

But for the public and for healthcare professionals to grow confident in Medicare Locals, they must hear about what it is you are doing, and they must be a part of it.

That is why this forum is so important.

I understand the purpose of you all being here together in Canberra is to clearly articulate a shared strategy for Medicare Locals …

…what is your common story and how do you tell it?

…here are you going as a network of Medicare Locals and how are you going to get there?

…ow do you continue building trust and respect amongst the people you serve?

…ow do you not only perform and succeed, but share that performance and success with your communities, and with each other?

…how do you build capacity and capability to take on increasingly sophisticated and complicated roles and responsibilities within the health system?

These are important questions and it is timely for you to be planning together about how you respond to them.

The importance of devolving decision making and responsibility to medicare locals – flexibility to support innovation

As a Government, we have given Medicare Locals the opportunity to play a central leadership role in reform of primary healthcare and consequently of the Australian health system more broadly.

This is both a great privilege and responsibility.

The devolution of decision making to a local level and more flexible funding allows Medicare Locals to be innovative and responsive to the unique health needs of their communities.

But it’s important to remember that the investments you are making in your communities are with the nation’s health dollar. And it’s critical that you get bang for our buck.

Your achievements so far have been impressive.

In recognition of that, I continue to look for other Commonwealth funded programs that can be devolved to the Medicare Local level.

Already, about 30 major health programs are being delivered through Medicare Locals.

And today, another program will be added to that list.

I am very pleased to announce that the Government’s

More Doctors for Outer Metropolitan Areas Relocation Incentive Grants  will be devolved to the Medicare Local level.

As you probably know, this program has been supporting doctors to relocate from inner to outer metropolitan areas.

This is helping even out medical care services in our communities and is reducing some of the geographical inequities that persist.

The transfer means 30 outer-metro Medicare Locals will be funded to administer the grant – which is backed by a $15 million Government investment over the next four years.

Responding to emerging community needs

In recent years, our Government has invested record amounts for more hospital beds, more clinics, more equipment for high-tech procedures and better health infrastructure.

We’ve also opened the door for thousands more doctors, nurses and allied health professionals.

But, at the primary healthcare end of the spectrum, what confronts today’s patients?

Will they share in the full benefits of the health resources of an advanced, developed nation?

Do people, especially the disadvantaged, see a clear pathway to wellbeing?

We know that lower-SES Australians still find it harder to access health services compared to their higher-SES counterparts.

Medicare Locals are instrumental in helping to address that inequality.

A great example – just a few days ago in Perth a new StreetDoctor Truck was launched at the headquarters of the Perth Central and East Metro Medicare Local.

This will provide healthcare services in inner Perth and the surrounding area for homeless and disadvantaged people.

The service provides general health checks, wound dressings, immunisations, harm minimisation and other counselling, and links patients to mainstream services.

This service launches with 2,500 active patients, four in every ten are under-25-year-olds, 30 per cent are Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, and the vast majority have mental health issues.

The service has important partnerships with Passages, Red Cross’ soup kitchens, Pharmacy Ashfield, The Town of Bassendean, Catholic volunteer friendship, and support workers.

Recognising this important community need, the Medicare Local has built the StreetDoctor up so that it now provides 40 hours of service a week – an incredible example of a collaborative response to a local health need.

And Medicare Locals are there in times of crisis.

Like in Queensland after the recent floods, the Sunshine Coast Medicare Local offered free mental health counselling to support the well-being of residents in Sunshine Coast and Gympie. And the Wide Bay Medicare Local was also very active in supporting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who were hit particularly hard.

Conclusion

It’s examples like those that really do speak volumes about the importance of Medicare Locals.

Local control and local solutions are seeing Medicare Locals delivering for communities across Australia.

Medicare Locals are an essential part of our universal healthcare system.

Our Government stands shoulder to shoulder with you all as you continue your fantastic work delivering healthcare to Australians when they need it, where they need it.

NACCHO’s 150+ members achieve great results in Federal health performance report

Health Perform

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework (HPF)

Download a copy of report here

Examples of our achievements

  • 2/3 of all performance based outcomes where from the Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Sector
  • 96% increase in episodes (1.22 mil – 2.5 mil) of care being delivered by the Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Sector
  • 150,000 eligible Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients have benefited from the CTG Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS Co-pay)
  • Compared Immunisation coverage rate for 2yr old children are nearly at the same level to wider Australia Immunisation (Aboriginal children 92.3% compared to 92.6% of other children)

Executive summary

This is the fourth report against the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework (HPF) and the first report based on the revisions to the framework endorsed by the Australian Health Minister’s Advisory Council (AHMAC) in 2011

The HPF was designed to measure the impact of the National Strategic Framework for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health (NSFATSIH) AND WILL BE AN IMPORTANT TOOL FOR DEVELOPING THE NEW National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Plan(NATSIHP)

See NACCHO recent 2013 submission to NATSIHP

The HPF monitors progress in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health outcomes, health system performance and the broader determinants of health. The health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples is improving for a number of measures, although there remain many areas where further concerted effort will be needed to achieve improvements in health outcomes.

Data quality limitations hamper our ability to monitor Indigenous health and the performance of the health system (see technical Appendix).

Initiatives to improve data quality have been introduced in recent years and are yielding results. However, caution is still required in interpreting these findings. Note : this report includes revised mortality data for the period 2007,2008 and 2009 due to revisions in the WA mortality data for this period.

Council of Australian Governments (COAG)

Targets

In December 2007, COAG agreed to a partnership between all levels of government to work with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples to close the gap in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander disadvantage.

During 2008 and 2009 new National Partnership Agreements were developed covering areas such as Indigenous early childhood, health, education and employment. The information in this report mainly relates to the period leading up to these agreements and for many of these initiatives it is still too early for the health outcome data to reflect the impact of this work.

Since the introduction of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework (HPF) there has been a significant increase in health assessments and chronic disease management items claimed through Medicare.

Given that two thirds of the current gap in health outcomes is due to chronic disease, these improvements in the detection and management of chronic disease are important.

COAG set six targets in 2008 including :

Closing the life expectancy gap within a generation

  • The gap in life expectancy at birth between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and other Australians for 2005-07 was estimated at 11.5 years for males and 9.7 years for females.
  • In the absence of new data on life expectancy (due to be released in late 2013), mortality rates provide an indication of progress. The graph below shows mortality rates from 1998 to 2010 and an indicative trajectory of mortality rates required to reach the target by 2031. This graph shows there has been a significant decline in Indigenous mortality rates in the last decade, however Indigenous rates are currently twice the non-Indigenous rate and this decline would need to accelerate to reach the target.

Halving the gap in mortality rates for Indigenous children under five within a decade

  • In 2008, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander child mortality rate was 213 per 100,000 compared to 101 per 100,000 for non-Indigenous children. This makes the baseline gap 112 per 100,000. Note : the 2008 baseline has been revised since the last report due to revisions in the WA mortality data.
  • The graph below shows child mortality rates from 1998 to 2010 and indicative trajectories required to meet the target by 2018. The 2009 and 2010 rates are within the range required to meet the target.

To read the full 227 page report

Download a copy of report here

Feb 2012 CEO update-Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (ACCHSs) Funding Policy Review

Registrations: In December 2011, OATSIH wrote to Healthy for Life Services and announced that only 50% of Healthy for Life Services had registered to use OCHREstreams and extended the deadline to the end of January 2012. By February 2012, several ACCHSs still remain unregistered with OCHREstreams. These services were contacted by OATSIH.

 OATSIHhave advised that the first collection of nKPIs data will be regarded as ‘a trial’ for the purposes of diagnosing any problems with the technical use of the OCHREStreams.

 NACCHO is pursuing a MoU with AIHW to:

 a. Establish a framework to:

(i) improve the quality and availability of health information and data from ACCHSs,

(ii) ensure that ACCHSs data is compiled in an appropriate manner, is used and shared by the parties consistent with applicable legislation and in accordance with agreed ‘Data Principles’.

(iii) facilitate the sharing of ACCHSs health information and data in response to research requests approved in accordance with this MOU.

b. Support ACCHSs to be influentially involved in decision-making regarding the culturally appropriate and respectful collection, use, disclosure and stewardship of health information and data from ACCHSs.

c. Work co-operatively towards the development of processes that enhance the capacity of NACCHO and Affiliates and ACCHSs to promote ACCHSs health information and data in a meaningful way.

 OSR: A range of issues have been identified around the new OSR Reporting Tool with regard to process and technical details.

 After making representation to OATSIH they have agreed to delay implementation of the new OSR until such time as the sector has had input into the final draft.  In 2012 the existing version will be used however it will not be done as a paper based system but rather through OCHREStreams as a transition to moving towards electronic reporting throughout the sector.